Member since Feb 14, 2011



  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Mumps Confirmed in Boise, Tied to University of Idaho Outbreak

According to the CDC most cases in outbreaks are already vaccinated. According to the FDA, outbreaks occur mostly in highly vaccinated populations. I want to hear the total number of how many were vaccinated vs. unvaccinated.

4 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by mkfamily on 01/15/2015 at 9:50 AM

Re: “Obama Gets His Grammar Critiqued on Reddit

How about he look at his own super pacs. He's willing to criticize the republican pacs but still willing to let his own super pacs fund his campaign. Can we say double standard?

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by mkfamily on 08/30/2012 at 8:58 AM

Re: “Anti-Bullying Bill Dies Without Receiving Hearing in House (Again)

The schools aren't doing there job in protecting the kids being bullied, or punishing the bullies. My son was bullied from 1st-3rd grade. The kids even took his glasses and stomped on them. I removed my kid from the school for good.

2 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by mkfamily on 03/27/2012 at 5:54 PM

Re: “Idaho's Epidemic of Fear: Vaccination Liberation Movement Takes a Shot at Public Health

Here is something written by a friend:
Lets do some critical thinking. Most critical thinking that is learned in a textbook is programmed brainwashing. A few answers to a question are made available and than the reader or student is guided to the answer that the business wants them to choose. This is common with the medical profession. When a young person is in school for the medical profession they don’t really do much critical thinking. Its about the same as in grade and high school. Chapters are crammed. Test answers are memorized. There really isn’t much discussion involved. And if a really sharp student questions a idea, subject or statement, they are usually brushed off as the teacher doesn’t want to get involved in getting off the beaten path. Its like the time a few years ago I was talking with a college student about chemistry. I stated it was a dead subject. He replied about dead things having life like a piece of furniture. I pointed to a desk and said so that is alive? He said there were atoms in it which had some sort of movement. I asked him to go back to his teacher and ask for some proof. He was a gutsy guy and questioned his teacher. The teacher gave him some typical mumbo jumbo which explained nothing and he proceeded to explain it to me. It was more than absurd. So I said look you pay this man to teach you. You have a right to get an answer that makes sense. I suggested he go back and just ask for the proof that these atoms were moving inside of any piece of furniture. I said any molecule can only be seen with an electron microscope and everything seen under that is not alive including atoms which are nothing more then guesses on the functions of molecules. When I saw him next, he said he put the professor to the wall with his questions. The professor responded, why are you taking this class and walked away. My young friend learned a valuable lesson. When you don’t understand something, don’t assume your to dumb to understand. If the person really knows what they are talking about, they can break it down and answer all questions.

So why am I bringing this up? Because I am going to give you a statement of facts about vaccinations and the results. Then we can discuss what the vaccinators conclude and what I conclude. The vaccinators conclusion will be based on theory. My conclusion will be based on common sense. This statement of fact comes from Dr. Peebles book, Vaccination a Curse.

“ In the same year that inoculation reached England (1721), 244 persons were inoculated in Boston, Mass., by Dr. Boyston, of whom six died.” The vaccinator would declare that 238 people were saved by the inoculation and that the six that died already had the disease at the time of inoculation, and couldn’t be saved. Does that make sense to you? Not if you think about it. First of all it implies the absurd thought that all 244 persons were going to get smallpox and the only way to prevent it was to inoculate all of them. Does that make sense to you? It might if you are brainless, but most people are not brainless, but they have no knowledge of the truth and so believe the “expert.” They just trust. A common sense thinking approach to any disease is to just look around at the people in your village, town, city and your own family. This would tell you that not only everyone does not get a particular disease, but in fact most people do not. You hear of people stating that everyone one they knew got chicken pox, measles or whooping cough when they were children. Yet when questioned, when asked to think about their best friends, having any diseases, all of a sudden there not so sure. The same was said of polio. It was said that everyone had polio, but just didn’t know it. And the people believed. My question was a simple one, if the person didn’t know he/she had polio or any other disease, how could they know? But that gets us back to belief in the “expert.” Do you really think that these people through their schools, advertising, TV shows and media don’t know how to program the people?
Now lets go back to the statement and use a little common sense. 244 people inoculated and six died. Well the six that died after the inoculation died from the inoculation. The 238 survived because their system was able to neutralize or eliminate the poison. That’s just common sense. All one needs to understand and deal with this is a little more faith in yourself and a little less faith in the so called expert.

Now I have discovered another problem the vaccinators have created. Vaccine virus injections.
Inoculations: Arm to Arm scarification.
Vaccination: Taking pus from the smallpox victim, scratching it into a cow, taking the cow-pus and injecting it into the person.
Immunization. This doesn’t even apply as putting poison in a body doesn’t prevent any disease.
So what is this poison injection to be called????? as it clearly is not any of the above.

23 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by mkfamily on 12/23/2011 at 12:30 PM

Re: “Idaho's Epidemic of Fear: Vaccination Liberation Movement Takes a Shot at Public Health

Here is some food for thought: Under goals see Substances which...: 1. will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness ; 12. alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced (aka - autism), 14. will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in UNDETECTABLE AMOUNTS. 16. ...sureptitiously administered (i.e. you do not know you received the they are in undetectable amounts...see point 14). 17. surreptitiously administered by above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for the person to perform activities... (i.e. ways to get it into your body...think about that, how do you get the population as a whole to take something...multiple times, in undetectable amounts, so that it affects their mentation, but does not leave a trace…

for those of you who do not believe our government would use our own children as test subjects....…

and I have many more links from mainstream articles about our government using foster kids as guinea pigs.

And who goes in for the medical testing trials to get paid? Low income people. They feel they may get medical help or a cure for free.

22 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by mkfamily on 12/23/2011 at 12:26 PM

Re: “Idaho's Epidemic of Fear: Vaccination Liberation Movement Takes a Shot at Public Health

I have a couple of questions for pro-vaxers. When you have taken your child in for their chicken pox vaccines were you told these things? The vaccine may shed for up to 6 weeks. The vaccinated child is supposed to be secluded away from others for that time. They are especially not supposed to be around pregnant women or infants. How many pregnant women take their child in for the vaccine? How many of these vaccinated children have an infant in their household? Have they told you that your chicken pox vaccinated child is not supposed to be exposed to salicylates? Salicylates can be found in many foods such as fruits, veggies, condoments, nuts etc. The reason they are not supposed to be exposed is because of Reye's syndrome.

Have they told you that after a child is vaccinated (with any vaccine) that crying unconsollably for 3 or more hours, you are supposed to take them to the ER. This is because of encephilitis. Yet, if you call the doc or nurse, they will tell you it is normal. It is not normal.

Did you know that in some of the vaccine inserts it says that SIDS is one of the dangers of vaccination?

All this can be found in the package inserts. Do you know that nurses and doctors do not read these inserts?

Did you know that most docs and nurses only get a very short instruction on vaccines, safety etc. They only go buy what they are told, not by actual research.

If your child is vaccinated and it is supposed to protect them from the illness, then why are you so afraid of my unvaccinated child? YOu say because of the infants? What about the vaccinated child spreading the vaccine form of the illness to the infant?

So if you take your child and get a live virus vaccine, the go out shopping and he or she touches the cart, the door or an may be shedding the virus for those who are unprotected. This includes the flumist. YOur child gets it, we all know that sniffing stuff up our noses makes them run. So the child uses his hand as the kleenex (as they all do), then he touches something else and you have just spread the flu. Or he sneezes and it goes all have just spread the flu. Congratulations!!

I have two vaccine injured children and two unvaccinated healthy children. I will not subject my two healthy children to the poisons in vaccines just for the health of your child. Why is your childs health more important than my childs health? Why do I have to take a chance on my children being injured just to save yours when yours "might" get an illness.

Do you all think that unvaccinated children are just reseviours for disease? They aren't. They have just as likely of a chance of getting a disease as your vaccinated child does. If their chances are the same, then why should we inject poison into them.

Would you let your child swallow liquid aluminum, or mercury, or phenol or formaldehyde? Then why do you inject it into their blood streams?

25 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by mkfamily on 12/23/2011 at 12:14 PM

Re: “Idaho's Epidemic of Fear: Vaccination Liberation Movement Takes a Shot at Public Health

***According to the FDA website: 8 vaccines contain forms of aborted fetal tissue (Fetal Cell Line Wistar RA 27/3, Fetal Cell Line WI-38, and MRC-5), human serum albumin (from human blood), genetically engineered human albumin, and DNA. MMR (MMRII), Chic Pox (Varivax), Chic Pox/MMR (ProQuad), Hep A (Havrix), Hep A (Vaqta), DTap/Hib/Polio (Pentacel), Rabies (ImoVax) and Rabies (RabAvert).
***According to a retired pharmaceutical scientist: 23 vaccines contain DNA.
***According to the CDC website: 7 vaccines contain either aborted fetal tissues, human serum albumin or DNA. (DTap/IPV-Pentacel, Hep A-Havrix, Hep A-Vaqta, Hep A/Hep B-Twinrix, MMRII, MMRV-Proquad, and Varicella (chicken Pox).… Vaccines and Autism, A new scientific review (cbs news investigation) Human DNA in vaccines… (Human DNA in vaccines) The article in the Journal of Immunotoxicology is entitled "Theoretical aspects of autism: Causes--A review." The author is Helen Ratajczak, surprisingly herself a former senior scientist at a pharmaceutical firm. Ratajczak did what nobody else apparently has bothered to do: she reviewed the body of published science since autism was first described in 1943. Not just one theory suggested by research such as the role of MMR shots, or the mercury preservative thimerosal; but all of them. Ratajczak says human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidences corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked. Ratajczak also says an additional increased spike in autism occurred in 1995 when chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue. A number of independent scientists have said they've been subjected to orchestrated campaigns to discredit them when their research exposed vaccine safety issues, especially if it veered into the topic of autism. We asked Ratajczak how she came to research the controversial topic. She told us that for years while working in the pharmaceutical industry, she was restricted as to what she was allowed to publish. "I'm retired now," she told CBS News. "I can write what I want."

Fetal Cell Line: MRC-5, WI-38, RA27/3 (also note the RA27/3 strain of rubella virus was observed to induce brain cell death), WI-26 VA4, HEK-293, and IMR-90. PER.C6 is a newer cell line developed by Crucell and licensed by Merck. According to this document, the fetus was healthy and normal when killed at 18 weeks. The mother decided to abort because she was unsure who the father was. At the outset PER.C6 was started for the sole purpose of vaccine development. This 2005 patent reads on line 0224, "Human embryonic retinoblast (HER) cells were isolated from the eyes of aborted fetuses of 18 and 21 weeks of age." (The patent is prefaced by this 2001 application assigned to Crucell). This research illustrates how the PER.C6 cell line is being promoted for use in flu, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, rabies, cancer, and other vaccines.

23 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by mkfamily on 12/23/2011 at 11:55 AM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2016 Boise Weekly

Website powered by Foundation