Strange article. is the author trying not to sound like a republican by insulting previous gop candidates and parts of Romney's campaign? And what is his about Bin Laden officially not being considered a threat since 2006. He was a threat at one point and could be again, he had dangerous ideas, and had followers willing to kill and be killed for Bin Laden and for their misconceptions about their own religion.
Back to Obama. he is running on a record that is the best we can hope for. McCain nor any other republican could have gotten our economy to a better place in four years than Obama did. He has spent a lot of money but most of it was necessary to keep the economy from hitting an even lower point than it did. Whether the recovery started in 2009 or later wont be known for years, but it has definitely started. The republicans want people to think that a recovery from such a deep recession can easily be fixed in four years or less, but that is a flat out lie. They assume that their constituents are too stupid to know better and will therefore vote for Romney. Regardless of who wins the election, the economy will recover in the coming years because of the policies implemented by Obama during his first term. Changes take time to actually take effect. Regardless, Obama is by far the better candidate to see his policies through. Romney's only interest is the upper class and big corporations. Nothing good can come from a Romney presidency. Obama 2012!
© 2013 Boise Weekly
Website powered by Foundation