Good Xians, Bad Xians | And a few ways to spot the difference | Bill Cope | Boise Weekly

Good Xians, Bad Xians 

And a few ways to spot the difference

Good Xians, Bad Xians

This last week, displayed prominently on a reader board you can hardly miss if you're driving I-84 to Boise from Meridian and points west, was this message: "EDUCATION IS USELESS WITHOUT THE BIBLE." The quote was attributed to Noah Webster, known for his fine dictionaries. Now, maybe Noah said it, maybe he didn't. There is a cottage industry of Christian fundamentalists desperate to prove that the earliest Americans were just as nuts as they are, and if history doesn't bear them out, they aren't shy about rewording it until it does.

This particular message board has come up with plenty of zingers before, my favorite being the classic, "GOD CREATED ADAM AND EVE, NOT ADAM AND STEVE." (I've been itching to ask the guy who thought that one up ... "Well if God didn't create Steve, who the hell did?") And some years ago, I actually turned another one of their nuggets into a column. (On that occasion, the board read: "ENVIRONMENTALISM IS A RELIGION THAT WILL LEAVE YOU IN THE DARK. THINK CALIFORNIA," and it referred to the power-grid crisis the Golden State was having at the time. Since that crisis turned out to be the result of Enron's manipulation and greed rather than environmental regulation, I've been waiting five years now for a retraction to show up on that reader board--maybe even an apology to environmentalists. To date, no luck.)

I wouldn't want the people of this church barn to think I'm picking on them specifically. I mean it from the bottom of my heart when I say I'm certain the members of that congregation are no more or no less nuts than members of any congregation in any fundamentalist hive anywhere in the country.

But it just so happens that big freeway-side pop-up of theirs is a convenient way for me to keep up with what's going on in the collective mind of their brand of faith-based delusion, and I thank them for that. How else would I know what gormy little claustrophobic paranoias they are hatching without that reader board? Other than blowing a Sunday by attending a fundamentalist service, that is. Uh-huh, like that's gonna happen.

My first impulse was to turn old Noah's (alleged) quote into another column--to point out that if education truly doesn't mean squat unless it complies with Biblical precepts, it will come as quite a shock to a great many well-educated people. Stephen Hawking, say. Or any astrophysicist, for that matter--or anyone involved beyond a Ma and Pa home-schooling level with the biological, geological or about every other -logical science you can name. And won't all those New Delhi engineers and doctors and technicians be surprised to find out the educations they are taking American jobs with aren't worth the paper their diplomas are printed on, having wasted their schoolin' days as Hindus and Sikhs and Buddhists?

I also thought of using this reader board sentiment to illustrate how the religious right simply cannot abide with anything that doesn't bend to their will--how if you've ever doubted they want to turn every aspect of American life into a testament to their fevered vision, this should confirm they are after no less than a complete theocracy, dedicated lock, stock and public school system to the Christianist manifesto.

But I'm not going to write that column. Not today, anyway. Life's too short to spend it all worrying what the nuts are up to, and between writing about the latest dimwitted thing they're pitching and writing about the latest dimwitted thing their favorite president is pitching, I hardly have time left over for any fun. Besides, I've been a little tough on our evangelical neighbors of late. If you didn't know me, you might think I was, like ... you know ... waging a war on Christianity. I sure don't want anyone thinking something like that, for Christ's sake. Hell, my momma was a Christian.

So I thought I would take this opportunity to demonstrate that I am definitely not waging a war on Christianity. And to that end, let me say how appreciative I am for all those fine, decent, generous, peace-loving, humble and accepting Christian souls who aren't gormy little claustrophobic paranoiacs. I'm referring to the millions of devout followers of Christ you don't see on Fox news posing as experts on what's destroying America's moral fiber. Who aren't preaching something so backwards and childish that you want to gag when you hear it. Who aren't filming their every sermon so that they can have their own show on the public access channel. Who aren't called into the White House whenever some feeble president needs a pat on the head. Who aren't making cheesy teevee commercials that try to make Jesus out as a cowboy. Who aren't always trying to kick-start Armageddon in the Mideast. Who aren't always bitching about a Ten Commandments monument somewhere, or a phrase in the Pledge of Allegiance, or gays, or Planned Parenthood or secular humanism. Who aren't always claiming to know the mind of God. Who aren't always in someone else's face.

There is no good way to include all the good work these good people do--daily, quietly and without the need to get their mugs on the news for doing it. But I thought if I were to borrow something from another old column of mine--a partial list of church organizations that stood against Bush's war in Iraq (beforehand, mind you)--it would give an idea of the breadth and depth of what I consider the real Christianity. The Christianity that will have to prevail (over Christianism) if Christianity has a snowball's chance of surviving in an educated world.

Here they are, in part: The World Council of Churches--The National Council of Churches--The Interfaith Alliance--the United Methodist Council of Bishops--United Methodist Clergy--United Methodist Women's Division--the Episcopal Presiding Bishop--the Presbyterian General Assembly Council--leaders of the Lutheran denominations as well as the United Church of Christ, the Unitarian Universalists, the Friends, the Quakers, the Amish, the Mennonites, the Brethern, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and, last but not least, Pope John Paul II.

There they are, in part. The Christians who did what Jesus would have done. The Christians I'm not waging war on.

Not to say there isn't a war being waged on them--or more to the point, their struggle to follow the teachings of Christ. But it ain't me waging it, Brothers. In fact, gentle Christian, if it's your downfall you fear, keep an eye over your right shoulder.

Tags:

Comments (16) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 16

Add a comment | All comments »

Amen, brother.

Posted by Dave1 on May 10, 2006 at 6:43 PM | Report this comment

Although you are funnier, you remind me a bit of Philip Yancey here. Soured on Christianity by a childhood spent among Southern bigots in the 50's and 60's, he pays tribute to his own list of Good Xians through his book "Soul Survivor : How Thirteen Unlikely Mentors Helped My Faith Survive the Church." Ease up a little on in-your-face Christians, though! The success of the Abolition and Civil Rights Movements is due largely to the commitment of Baptists who weren't afraid to be in-your-facedly counter-cultural. Here's hoping Christians of their ilk continue to turn up the volume in their protests against the War in Iraq and any other Empire-building adventures dreamed up by the NEOCONSERVATIVES (read, "former liberal followers of Trotsky") whose presence befouls the current administration. It's interesting to note that among the Good Xians there are those whose passion for defending human rights encompasses a desire to protect the unborn.

Posted by PacifistFundy on May 11, 2006 at 2:36 AM | Report this comment

This just in. Someone has just sent George W. Bush a "What Would Jesus Do?" letter. Ignoring for the sake of discussion the doctrinal differences between Islam and Christianity, I am trying to figure out where Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad falls in the Bad Xian--Good Xian spectrum.

Posted by PacifistFundy on May 11, 2006 at 10:20 PM | Report this comment

Thank you for the clever and careful take on the Xians. Be wary of even the most unassuming Xians. You listed some groups and individuals that could turn on you like an agry hobbit whose 'precious' ring has abandoned him. These new (some are not so new) crazed Xians have the same dangerous zealotry as any suicide bomber in the middle east.**** These faith nuts are a dangerous collective. Within most forms of god fearing religions free thought is deemed to be the work of the demon(s). Any kind of questioning usually results in someone regressing to a response of "the devil is working on your soul."**** I rank the fundies, dynamite muslims, zionists, et.al. in the category of dangerous simpletons. Spend only a few moments on pub.access Xian channels and be afraid, very afraid.**** I would really enjoy if people treated their religion like they treat their pornography habits. Keep it behind closed doors and don't bother me with it unless I ask to see your collection. To be on the safe side arm yourself with some limited knowledge of the bible. If you need some help learing about that historical text there are a lot of sites on our friendly internet that will guide you to the truths behind the bible. And remember, the good book is accurate. It is the word of god and nothing should be taken out of context or interpretted by an untrained mind. This link should help you understand the power of the bible.******************* www.evilbible.com*************************** ENJOY!!!!

Posted by Lib.Redneck on May 12, 2006 at 9:57 AM | Report this comment

Congrats to all the nouveau-bigots. You've added another entry into the history books in the section on 'hatred'. It's pretty easy to make the comparison between a sheet-wearing racist and the new PC-bigots of today. The sheet-wearing racists use the n-word. The PC-bigots use "Xian". Seriously - why do that? Is there any reason, other than to offend people? Both Mr. Cope and one of the posters above hint at the fact that they are just a bit more intelligent than the rest of us. How can you call yourself intelligent when you use *deliberately offensive* slurs to refer to a group of people? My mom taught me a long time ago that people who do things like that are just plain nasty (not based on your faith or lack of faith...based on your rude and disrespectful behaviour). I guess your mom was out at a clan rally that day, huh? You say you don't like people like Pat Robertson and 'in-your-face' christians? Guess what- you're a different side of the same ugly coin. 'Xian' is a slur that's just as offensive to some as the word that starts with 'n'. If you continue to use that slur, you are making a personal statement that it's okay for YOU to be a bigot. Try to justify that your bigotry is OK. Sheet-wearing racists do that too. Basically, any argument you might use to justify your bigotry has probably been used in some form by the sheet-wearers long before you ever thought of it. If you look to people like THAT for leadership, how is it again that you can justify your intelligence? Pat Robertson. Jerry Fallwell. Bill Cope. Sheet-wearing racists. PC nouveau-bigots. They are all cut from the same shabby cloth. Enjoy your hate-filled lives if you can, folks. Me - I choose to love my neighbor.

Posted by Caltrop on May 12, 2006 at 3:57 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

From the Archives

Author Archives

Most Commented On

  • The Kill Joy

    Otter's inferior past is Idaho's inferior future
    • Feb 3, 2010
  • Off Color

    You du man, Steele ... not the man
    • Jan 20, 2010
  • G.A.G. On Broncos

    Enough is never enough
    • Jan 13, 2010
  • More»

Most Emailed Stories

Top Viewed Stories

© 2010 Boise Weekly