Streetcar It Because, Well, Yes You Can 

Political opponents to Boise Mayor Dave Bieter scored a one-two punch last week, forcing the City Council to stall a $90,000 public relations contract that would have helped craft the city's streetcar spin and initiating a petition drive by a city council candidate to force a popular vote on the $60 million plan.

Sucking the hind teat of Boise blogger Dave Frazier, the Idaho Statesman editorialized against the PR contract with Statesman editorialist Kevin Richert arguing that Bieter has bungled the project.

But here is something that has been lost in the streetcar counter-spin, which is now sailing under Frazier's banner headline Trolly Folly: The city is pursuing a downtown streetcar because that's the one transit project it can pursue.

Opposition candidates for City Council, also taking Frazier's lead, are advocating for a bus-first approach, which comes off as disingenuous when coupled with their anti-tax stances.

But Boise is only one partner in the regional bus system, the largest player for sure, but only one player on the cash-strapped agency's board. The city, along with Valley Regional Transit, has advocated for many years for local option taxes to pay for a better bus system or light rail into Canyon County, to no avail. VRT and Valley Ride are supported by voluntary contributions from Treasure Valley cities and cannot raise their own tax base, so the city has limited means for unilaterally boosting the regional bus system.

Similarly, some have argued that what is really needed is a high-speed train into Canyon County, again, something the city supports. But Boise can't build its own light rail to Caldwell without support from all the mayors--and state legislators--along the route.

So when Bieter sat down two years ago to craft his State of the City speech, he announced that he'd be tackling the one major transit project that his administration could pull off, a downtown streetcar, with plans for three additional spurs sometime in the future. The first line Bieter hopes to pay for with a large federal grant and a Local Improvement taxing district, which many of the downtown property owners along the streetcar route--the ones who will pay for it--have supported all along. It is short, but still useful to those who work or park on the outer edges of the downtown core (St. Luke's, the Linen District). The spurs, which will eventually connect downtown to Boise State, out to 30th Street, and down to Parkcenter, will be even more useful.

Now citydesk just came up with that spin all on our own and it won't cost you, the public, a dime, because BW is always free. But here's our advice to the City Council: Get some professional help on this so you don't bungle the one chance Boise has to make some public transportation headway in Idaho.

If you don't, you may have to deal with more citizen initiatives from the likes of Ryan Davidson next.

Davidson, the guy who almost put the (Thai) stick back into the Wood River Valley, scored a minor victory against the man in a Blaine County courtroom in recent weeks. That is, if the Marijuana Policy Project, the nation's top pressure group for the legalization of weed, can be considered "the man."

Davidson won a grant from MPP back in 2004 to run pro-marijuana initiatives in Hailey, Ketchum and Sun Valley. He relocated to Blaine County and hired on some buddies. But when all three cities rejected Davidson's initial petition drive, MPP cut him loose, saying he did not live up to his promises.

Davidson persevered on his own, however, suing all three cities and eventually winning three pro-pot ballot measures in Hailey. The city of Hailey now has a pot advisory committee and is exploring the possibilities for medical marijuana use.

Last year, Davidson sued MPP, trying to recoup $44,000, the unpaid portion of his grant. A Blaine County jury found him deserving, but awarded him a mere $11,000, which Davidson doubts he'll ever see.

Davidson has moved back to Garden City, where he is involved in local GOP politics as a Ron Pauler and works in pest control with his father, but says he is basically unemployed at the moment since all the bugs are now frozen.

Meanwhile, the fight for marijuana in Idaho may soon move to the State Legislature. Rep. Tom Trail, a Moscow Republican and agricultural expert, has renewed his pledge to introduce a medical marijuana bill in January along the lines of the laws in Washington, Nevada, Montana, Oregon and Hawaii.

In the same vein, it is becoming increasingly clear what the Idaho Congressional delegation has been smoking in terms of health care reform. The Idaho Statesman revealed last week that Idaho's three Republican reps pay a mere $356.59 a month for federal health coverage for themselves and their spouses. They get a low-deductible plan provided by Blue Cross/Blue Shield. Democrat Walt Minnick pays quite a bit more to cover his wife and two young kids--$1,120.47.

But aside from their reasonable and comprehensive health coverage, which Minnick spokesman John Foster attributed to the large federal pool in which they swim, Idaho lawmakers have also been swimming in cash from the very parties profiting from our broken healthcare system.

Sen. Mike Crapo leads the pack with $908,241 in total health sector campaign contributions in the last two decades. Rep. Mike Simpson has taken $390,329 from health interests since 1989, which include health insurers, pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, nursing homes and hospitals. Minnick has netted $144,164 from these interests in his short year in office and Sen. Jim Risch has $94,200 in health gravy to his name.

This data all comes from the opensecrets.org Web site, a project of the Center for Responsive Politics.

Comments (7) RSS

Showing 1-5 of 7

Add a comment | All comments »

Just because you can build something doesn't mean you should build something.

Just because you can build something doesn't make it a good idea.

Speaking as a lifelong Idaho resident, a Boise resident for over 40 years, and a Boise business owner for almost 30 years, all i can say is the streetcar is the nuttiest thing the city has come up with in my lifetime. Bar none.

Sure, go ahead and build it. Then watch the lease rates, parking fees, and taxes go up, up, up to keep it running, while other public projects suffer. That is EXACTLY what happened in Portland, with it's higher population and density - and they charge to ride their streetcar. The Boise one, if built, will be free to ride, not generating any income.

Boise is the city that doesn't even have enough money to maintain the Greenbelt properly, the parks are suffering, the arts programs funding has been cut, and it is running a $9+ million deficit on top of a whole litany of other shortfalls. The streetcar will not fix any of the cities problems - it will add to them by taking more money away from other needed projects.

The city needs professional help on this all right.

Posted by AlphaDR on October 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM | Report this comment

Boise Streetcar:

The proponents (Mayor Dave and his Council toadies) project 1200 riders per day. To me, that seems wildly optimistic, but let's use that number anyway. And let's say the thing runs 365 days/year. Also optimistic... it won't run on the days the streets are closed for various events. But we'll use 365. So, optimistically, the streetcar will furnish 438,000 rides per year.

The proponents estimate a $2 million per year ongoing cost to operate.

Translates into $4.57 for every ride. Using the numbers of the people who are IN FAVOR of the thing! (And of course, that totally excludes the cost of building it.)

If 300 people per day is the average ridership, rather than 1200 (300 is approximately how many use the Little Rock streetcar each day), the cost per ride goes to almost $20.

(Sorry to harsh everybody's Streetcar Buzz with cold, hard numbers.)

Posted by bikeboy on October 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM | Report this comment

I am an 81-year-old resident of Minnesota, and I know nor care anything about your Boise politics. But I have a serious complaint, and that is that your refer that someone is sucking the hind teat of David Frazier. And this is where my problem begins. I am David Frazier's uncle, and while David may have his faults, one of them is not that he has anyone sucking his hind teat. Hind teats come on pigs. David and I are of a respected Scottish clan and I can tell you that none of us have hind teats.

Now you go ahead and have your mudslinging jollies, but don't imply that we Fraziers have hind teats!

Posted by Rex on October 15, 2009 at 5:06 PM | Report this comment

Way to go, Uncle Rex! David has cared so much for this community for many years, even taking the "leaders" to court(and winning) more than once. With his increased public profile in our local politics, due to more and more citizens being aware of the Guardian blog, liberals have started slamming Dave and continually trying to dis-credit him for their political gain. Your response is one of a strong family watching out for each other. If we had more families such as yours, our society would be in much better shape. I admire your position, and I have a feeling that while no one in your family has "hind teats" I would wager that your family has been blessed with "brass _____"!

Posted by Cyclops388 on October 16, 2009 at 8:51 AM | Report this comment

Well you are wrong about who supports it -- I live in the proposed impact area of the streetcar and all I am very opposed to the streetcar. It is a dumb idea that won't help anyting and may even make things worse. If someone was really serious about transportation they should look at starting with University to downtown or Airport to downtown and not a silly loop aorund a few blocks that are incredibly easy to walk. A better bus system would be much more scalable both up and down and would have less impact to traffic.

Posted by garyz on October 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM | Report this comment

Add a comment

From the Archives

Author Archives

Most Commented On

  • Mark Menlove

    Advocating for the peace and quiet of winter
    • Nov 4, 2009
  • You're the Real Cost

    Spinning health-care reform to the end game
    • Nov 4, 2009
  • Flying Signs

    Increase in panhandling reveals new demographic
    • Nov 18, 2009
  • More»

Top Viewed Stories

© 2009 Boise Weekly