View Full Version : Great republican debagte in SC
Thompson on top, Romney a strong second and huckabe/Rudy tied for third.
Erika
01-10-2008, 11:53 PM
A group of pathetic war mongerors. Terror, terror, oh and some more terror.
I thought it was so realisticaly funny when Paul asked if 5 Iranian speedboats truly constituted a danger to a U.S. Navy ship. LMAO at the thought process of the bushbot republicans. It's like their hysteria about Iraq having WMD's, mushroom clouds, and the rest of their terror idiocy.
We should hide and act terrorized because 5 Iranian speedboats challenged a naval ship. Such idiocy by the bushbots.
I heard people at THE RAM commenting that those little boats were smaller than the ones they race around in at Lucky Peak Reservoir. So what is the story, has our military become water wimps or is the press inferring that anyone under the bush command is crying WOLF just like DUMBYA did with all those WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. Either way it certainly shows the moronic REPUBLICAN lust to create anything that might cause war, war and more war.
Hell, even the Idaho loser REPUBLICAN politicians and their flock of selfish ME ME voters want to take insurance away from people who can't afford it such as those with only one lung, bad knees, bad ankles, bad hips, bad back and cancer of the spleen, spine and jaw. Selfish GOP has no heart and have their pathetic sheep attacking not only just adults but they try to deprive babies on respirators, asthmatic toddlers and young diabetic children from affording medical treatment through the SCHIP program.
Drivesme
01-11-2008, 01:13 PM
When are the republicans going to do what they all want to do and just dig raygun up and run him for president?
McGyver
01-11-2008, 03:23 PM
Thompson on top, Romney a strong second and huckabe/Rudy tied for third.
And Yet "Unknown GOP Candidate" could still beat them all! :rolleyes:
************************************************** ************************************************** *
A group of pathetic war mongerors. Terror, terror, oh and some more terror.
I thought it was so realisticaly funny when Paul asked if 5 Iranian speedboats truly constituted a danger to a U.S. Navy ship. LMAO at the thought process of the bushbot republicans. It's like their hysteria about Iraq having WMD's, mushroom clouds, and the rest of their terror idiocy.
We should hide and act terrorized because 5 Iranian speedboats challenged a naval ship. Such idiocy by the bushbots.
perhaps a reminder of what 1 small boat can do:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.foxnews.com/images/268992/2_61_031307_uss_cole1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258734,00.html&h=240&w=320&sz=22&hl=en&start=11&sig2=xdX16ZE7kdGvcsa4kH0RUg&tbnid=BWA_WF94kpn22M:&tbnh=89&tbnw=118&ei=qvaHR-SYHI_eigG4sMGBDA&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcole%2Battack%26gbv%3D2%26svnum%3D10% 26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX
How soon folk forget.
Erika
01-11-2008, 09:43 PM
The only issue the GOP think they can win on. We're all going to shake in our shoes because of fear 24 hours a day?
Not for any longer.
Funny thing about terror, it doesn't care what the folk being attacked think.
That said, I partly agree. The issue this year will be bucks and the economy, not a won war. The candidate who can address that issue without raising taxes or resorting to class envy, will be the winner.
Erika
01-11-2008, 10:59 PM
Funny thing about terror, it doesn't care what the folk
being attacked think.
That said, I partly agree. The issue this year will be bucks and the economy, not a won war. The candidate who can address that issue without raising taxes or resorting to class envy, will be the winner.
No wonder you want the subject changed.
We will be there until the job is done...how long will we fund welfare? What about that free health care everyone demands? I assume we will pour money into those ratholes forever.
Erika
01-11-2008, 11:08 PM
You always bring this garbage up and never provide figures. Welfare to the corporate rich, the farmers, defense contractors?
In the meantime look at the taxes paid in Idaho for food.
Take your pick, all welfare. individual, corporate, agricultural, you name it and is is all bad as a long term solution to anything.
:eek:
Idaho loser REPUBLICAN politicians and their flock of selfish ME ME voters want to take insurance away from people who can't afford it such as those with only one lung, bad knees, bad ankles, bad hips, bad back and cancer of the spleen, spine and jaw. Selfish GOP has no heart and have their pathetic sheep attacking not only just adults but they try to deprive babies on respirators, asthmatic toddlers and young diabetic children from affording medical treatment through the SCHIP program.
Take your pick, all welfare. individual, corporate, agricultural, you name it and is is all bad as a long term solution to anything.
:eek:
Idaho loser REPUBLICAN politicians and their flock of selfish ME ME voters want to take insurance away from people who can't afford it such as those with only one lung, bad knees, bad ankles, bad hips, bad back and cancer of the spleen, spine and jaw. Selfish GOP has no heart and have their pathetic sheep attacking not only just adults but they try to deprive babies on respirators, asthmatic toddlers and young diabetic children from affording medical treatment through the SCHIP program.
Yeah, whatever. It is amusing to see folk call those who wish to keep what they earn as 'selfish' while those who insist on taking it for their personal benefit are selfless saints.:D
It is the same thinking bank robbers and the IRS use.
Drivesme
01-12-2008, 01:21 PM
Yeah, whatever. It is amusing to see folk call those who wish to keep what they earn as 'selfish' while those who insist on taking it for their personal benefit are selfless saints.:D
It is the same thinking bank robbers and the IRS use.
You offer no proof......as usual.
Whatever you say Junior, whatever...:rolleyes:
You offer no proof......as usual.
You are living and posting proof...:D
Drivesme
01-12-2008, 03:23 PM
Whatever you say Junior, whatever...:rolleyes:
So only other people have to provide 'proof' jimmy?
Never you??
Everyone else posts opinion, but you of course.
I certainly don't ned to provide it to you. When you produce anything like an argument we'll talk.
Thompson on top, Romney a strong second and huckabe/Rudy tied for third.
I DID NOT SEE THOMPSON ON TOP IN SOUTH CAROLINA POLLS or in the debate or POLLS in FLORIDA, INFACT I DID NOT SEE HIM AT ALL---DUH!
Here is an interesting bunch of historical facts about Romney. He changes his mind like women are known to do.
In 1994, Mitt Romney challenged liberal Ted Kennedy for Kennedy's U.S. Senate seat. To win as a Republican in a liberal state like Massachusetts, Romney had to move toward the political center. He narrowly lost to Kennedy. In 2002, Mitt Romney ran for governor of Massachusetts, again having to move to the center in a liberal state. In 2005, Romney began seeking the Republican presidential nomination and had to move rightward to win in the primary states, which bring out the most conservative voters in the party. Notice his change in positions to adapt to the majority of voters in each particular race. Really quite revealing -- and shameful.
ON ABORTION
1994: Believed abortion should be safe and legal
2002: Personally against abortion but pro-abortion rights as governor, endorsed legalization of RU-486 (an artificial steroid that blocks progesterone, a hormone needed to continue a pregnancy)
2007: Firmly anti-abortion
ON STEM CELL RESEARCH
2002: Endorsed embryonic stem cell research
2005: Vetoed stem cell research bill
ON GUN CONTROL
1994: Supported assault weapons ban and Brady bill, rebuffed the NRA
2002: Supported assault weapons ban and Massachusetts' tough laws on gun control.
2006: Joined NRA as a life member and said that states should ease licensing requirements; claimed he was a gun owner but later admitted that he's didn't in fact own a firearm
ON MINIMUM WAGE
1994: Opposed increase as an "anti-business" position but told David Brinkley in October that he supported tying an increase to rate of inflation.
2002: Supported increase in line with inflation
2006: Vetoed minimum wage increase
ON GAY MARRIAGE
1994: Opposed federal marriage amendment, vowed to help establish "full equality for America's gays and lesbians"
2002: Provided legal protection to same-sex couples in Massachusetts
2007: Supported federal marriage amendment limiting marriage to between one man and one woman and worked to block same-sex couples from adopting
GAYS IN THE MILITARY
1994: Supported "Don't ask, Don't tell," saying it was a step toward "gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation's military"
2007: Stated emphatically that gays should not be allowed to openly serve in the military.
ON TAX CUTS
1994: Opposed capital gains tax cut
2002: Refused to sign "no new taxes" pledge
2007: Supported capital gains tax cut as part of his pledge to make President Bush's tax cuts permanent and signed "no new taxes" pledge
ON REAGAN-BUSH
1994: "I do not want to go back to Reagan-Bush. I was an independent during Reagan-Bush."
2006: "I am a Reagan Republican"
Those debaters in Florida certainly mentioned the Clintons constantly--are they stricken or threatened by their beauty, intelligence or sexuality?
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.